Maximizing Profitability and Occupancy: An Optimal Pricing Strategy for Airbnb Hosts Using Regression Techniques and Natural Language Processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the competitive landscape of Airbnb hosting, optimizing pricing strategies for properties is a complex challenge that requires revenue maximization with high occupancy rates. This research aimed to introduce a solution that leverages big data and machine learning techniques to help hosts improve their property’s market performance. Our primary goal was to introduce a solution that can augment property owners’ understanding of their property’s market value within their urban context, thereby optimizing both the utilization and profitability of their listings. We employed a multi-faceted approach with diverse models, including support vector regression, XGBoost, and neural networks, to analyze the influence of factors such as location, host attributes, and guest reviews on a listing’s financial performance. To further refine our predictive models, we integrated natural language processing techniques for in-depth listing review analysis, focusing on term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF), bag-of-words, and aspect-based sentiment analysis. Integrating such techniques allowed for in-depth listing review analysis, providing nuanced insights into guest preferences and satisfaction. Our findings demonstrated that AirBnB hosts can effectively utilize both state-of-the-art and traditional machine learning algorithms to better understand customer needs and preferences, more accurately assess their listings’ market value, and focus on the importance of dynamic pricing strategies. By adopting this data-driven approach, hosts can achieve a balance between maintaining competitive pricing and ensuring high occupancy rates. This method not only enhances revenue potential but also contributes to improved guest satisfaction and the growing field of data-driven decisions in the sharing economy, specially tailored to the challenges of short-term rentals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".