MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402601487 · doi:10.3390/molecules29184429

C-C Bonding in Molecular Systems via Cross-Coupling-like Reactions Involving Noncovalently Bound Constituent Ions

2024· article· en· W4402601487 on OpenAlexafffund
Stephen Kerr, Fedor Y. Naumkin

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecules · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsIonChemistryCoupling reactionCoupling (piping)CrystallographyMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon-based molecules are of universal importance for a huge variety of chemical and biological processes. The complication of the structure of such molecules proceeds via the bonding of carbon atoms. An efficient mechanism for such reactions proceeds via cross-coupling, related to the association of bond-terminating counter-ions. Here, an uncommon version of such a process is investigated, with at least some ions bound in the system noncovalently and/or switching the bonding mode in due course. The analyzed sample reactions involve a single C-C bond formation in environmentally relevant halocarbon species and involve alkali-halide ion-pair components. A consistent ab initio computational study predicts the related energy barriers to alter significantly in the presence of the ion pair. Different channels are checked, with the carbon-halogen bond cleavage preceding or following the actual C-C bonding and with the counter-ions located closely or farther apart. The relative heights of the corresponding energy barriers are found to be switched by the ion pair. The above results suggest a possibility of facilitating such reactions without expensive catalysts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMoleculesSame topicCatalytic Cross-Coupling ReactionsFrench-language works237,207