MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402603709 · doi:10.4095/p8stuehwyc

Python version of Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor for retrieving canopy biophysical variables from Sentinel-2 multispectral data

2024· report· fr· W4402603709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Najib Djamai, Richard Fernandes, Liang Sun, F. Canisius, Gang Hong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPython (programming language)Multispectral imageComputer scienceCanopyRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceGeographyProgramming languageArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La mission Sentinel-2 de Copernicus est conçue pour fournir des données pouvant être utilisées pour cartographier les variables biophysiques de la végétation a une échelle globale. Les estimations des variables biophysiques de la végétation ne sont pas encore produites de manière opérationnelle par le segment au sol de Sentinel-2. Plutôt, un algorithme de prédiction, appelé Simplified Level 2 Prototype Processor (SL2P), a été défini par l'Agence Spatiale Européenne. SL2P utilise deux réseaux neuronaux à rétropropagation, un pour estimer le variable biophysique de la végétation et l’autre pour quantifier l'incertitude de l'estimation, en utilisant une base de données de conditions de canopée globalement représentatives peuplée à l'aide de simulations de modèle de transfert radiatif de la canopée. SL2P a été mis en œuvre dans la boîte à outils LEAF du Centre Canadien de Télédétection qui s'appuie sur Google Earth Engine. Ce document décrit une implémentation PYTHON de SL2P (SL2P-PYTHON) qui fournit des estimations identiques estimations obtenues avec LEAF en utilisant la même image Sentinel-2 en entrée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.141

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→