Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik Pada Dinas Ketenakerjaan Dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendalami dan menganalisis akuntabilitas birokrasi dalam pelayanan publik yang dilakukan oleh Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT). Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami praktik-praktik akuntabilitas yang diterapkan oleh birokrasi tersebut dalam memberikan layanan kepada masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif untuk menggambarkan fenomena. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pejabat dan staf Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi kabupaten sikka, observasi langsung terhadap proses pelayanan, serta analisis dokumen terkait. Selain itu, survei juga dilakukan untuk mengukur persepsi masyarakat terhadap tingkat kepuasan mereka terhadap pelayanan yang diberikan oleh lembaga tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; (1) Akuntabilitas birokrasi dalam Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka belum sepenuhnya optimal. (2) Meskipun terdapat upaya-upaya untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan pertanggungjawaban, masih terdapat beberapa kendala dan hambatan dalam pelaksanaan akuntabilitas tersebut. (3) Faktor-faktor seperti kurangnya sumber daya, kurangnya pengawasan, dan kebijakan yan optimal menjadi penyebab utama dari belum optimalnya akuntabilitas tersebut. This research aims to explore and analyze bureaucratic accountability in public services carried out by the Manpower and Transmigration Service of Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) Province. The main focus of this research is to understand the accountability practices implemented by the bureaucracy in providing services to the community. The research method used is a qualitative approach to describe the phenomenon. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with officials and staff of the Manpower and Transmigration Service, direct observation of the service process, and analysis of related documents. Apart from that, a survey was also conducted to measure the public's perception of their level of satisfaction with the services provided by the institution. The research results show that; (1) Bureaucratic accountability in the Sikka Regency Manpower and Transmigration Service is not yet fully optimal. (2) Even though there are efforts to increase transparency and accountability, there are still several obstacles and obstacles in implementing this accountability. (3) Factors such as lack of resources, lack of supervision, and policies that are not yet optimal are the main causes of this lack of optimal accountability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".