MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402606803 · doi:10.35965/pja.v2i1.4600

Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Dalam Pelayanan Publik Pada Dinas Ketenakerjaan Dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur

2024· article· id· W4402606803 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueParadigma Journal of Administration · 2024
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Administration in Developing Nations
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendalami dan menganalisis akuntabilitas birokrasi dalam pelayanan publik yang dilakukan oleh Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka, Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur (NTT). Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami praktik-praktik akuntabilitas yang diterapkan oleh birokrasi tersebut dalam memberikan layanan kepada masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif untuk menggambarkan fenomena. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pejabat dan staf Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi kabupaten sikka, observasi langsung terhadap proses pelayanan, serta analisis dokumen terkait. Selain itu, survei juga dilakukan untuk mengukur persepsi masyarakat terhadap tingkat kepuasan mereka terhadap pelayanan yang diberikan oleh lembaga tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa; (1) Akuntabilitas birokrasi dalam Dinas Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Kabupaten Sikka belum sepenuhnya optimal. (2) Meskipun terdapat upaya-upaya untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan pertanggungjawaban, masih terdapat beberapa kendala dan hambatan dalam pelaksanaan akuntabilitas tersebut. (3) Faktor-faktor seperti kurangnya sumber daya, kurangnya pengawasan, dan kebijakan yan optimal menjadi penyebab utama dari belum optimalnya akuntabilitas tersebut. This research aims to explore and analyze bureaucratic accountability in public services carried out by the Manpower and Transmigration Service of Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara (NTT) Province. The main focus of this research is to understand the accountability practices implemented by the bureaucracy in providing services to the community. The research method used is a qualitative approach to describe the phenomenon. Data collection was carried out through in-depth interviews with officials and staff of the Manpower and Transmigration Service, direct observation of the service process, and analysis of related documents. Apart from that, a survey was also conducted to measure the public's perception of their level of satisfaction with the services provided by the institution. The research results show that; (1) Bureaucratic accountability in the Sikka Regency Manpower and Transmigration Service is not yet fully optimal. (2) Even though there are efforts to increase transparency and accountability, there are still several obstacles and obstacles in implementing this accountability. (3) Factors such as lack of resources, lack of supervision, and policies that are not yet optimal are the main causes of this lack of optimal accountability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it