MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402608658 · doi:10.4039/tce.2024.15

Survey of <i>Melanoplus gaspesiensis</i> and other alpine Acrididae (Orthoptera) on four summits of Gaspésie National Park, Québec, Canada

2024· article· en· W4402608658 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kevin Gauthier, Michel Saint‐Germain, Maxim Larrivée

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Entomologist · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsEspace pour la vieUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcrididaeOrthopteraNational parkGeographyEcologyForestryBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alpine tundra areas are threatened by anthropogenic climate change. They are also often represented as hotspots of endemism. Studying the insect communities associated with these habitats is therefore highly relevant. Melanoplus gaspesiensis Vickery is a grasshopper species known for its extremely limited distribution; it is considered endemic to Mont Albert, on the Gaspé Peninsula, Québec, Canada. Given its extremely limited distribution and with its habitat being particularly sensitive to climate change, the species is likely to soon be considered “at risk” at both the provincial and national levels. In order to confirm the current distribution of M. gaspesiensis, we sampled Acrididae on four alpine summits of the Gaspé Peninsula. Four species of Acrididae were captured. Almost 85% of the captured specimens were M. gaspesiensis, all of which were captured on Mont Albert. Our data are thus coherent with the species being endemic to that summit. The unique geology of Mont Albert (serpentine) may explain why M. gaspesiensis appears to be restricted to this one summit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian EntomologistSame topicFire effects on ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207