MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P146 EFFECT OF HOME BLOOD PRESSURE TELE-MONITORING PATHWAY WITH PHARMACIST CASE MANAGEMENT TO SUPPORT PATIENTS DISCHARGED FROM EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH ASYMPTOMATIC HYPERTENSION: A STUDY PROTOCOL FOR MULTICENTRE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TEC4HOME-BP)

2024· article· en· W4402610363 on OpenAlexaff
Karen C. Tran, Laura M. Kuyper, Birinder Mangat, Jennifer Ringrose, Chad Kim-Sing, Heather Lindsay, Karen Dahri, Martin Dawes, Hubert Wong, Jennifer Coderio, Meagan Mak, Helen Novak Lauscher, Nadia Khan, Kendall Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hypertension · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacistRandomized controlled trialAsymptomaticEmergency departmentBlood pressureEmergency medicineProtocol (science)Medical emergencyPharmacySurgeryFamily medicineInternal medicineAlternative medicineNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Severely elevated blood pressure (BP) in the emergency department (ED) has recently been associated with undiagnosed hypertension and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, regardless of the initial reason (e.g.: pain or anxiety) for the ED visit. Clinical uncertainty exists on how best to manage severe asymptomatic BP post-discharge from the ED. In this study protocol, we propose home BP telemonitoring with pharmacist case management intervention on participants discharged from the ED with severe asymptotic hypertension. The overall purpose of this trial is to evaluate whether home BP telemonitoring and pharmacist case management can improve BP management in participants discharged from the ED with severe asymptotic hypertension and whether participants find this intervention to be acceptable. Methods: The study is a multi-centre, randomized controlled trial of 408 participants discharged from the ED with severe hypertension (defined as average of 3 readings systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥ 100 mm Hg over 3 readings). Participants will be randomized to either usual care or home BP telemonitoring and pharmacist case management for 12-months. The primary outcome is proportion achieving disease specific SBP control using 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at 12-months. Secondary outcomes are change in SBP and DBP based on 24 h ABPM and home BP averages at 6- and 12-months. Patient acceptability and satisfaction will be assessed using EuroQoL 5-level EQ5 version and patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form. Exploratory outcomes include adverse events, prescription of anti-hypertensive medications, fidelity of interventions and health care utilization. Conclusions: Results from this study will advise the integration of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist case management pathway as key clinical strategy to improve patient flow in the ED, reduce length of stay in the ED, and improve BP control in patients with asymptomatic severe hypertension in the ED. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT 06303206

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HypertensionSame topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207