Breeding Strategies for Enhancing Medicinal Properties of <i>Lonicera japonica</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lonicera japonica is widely recognized for its medicinal properties, especially in traditional medicine, where it is known for its anti-inflammatory, antiviral and antioxidant effects.In this study, the methods of improving the medicinal quality of honeysuckle by breeding strategies were discussed, focusing on increasing the yield of flavonoid and other key active compounds.The study analyzed genetic diversity and molecular markers associated with medicinal traits in wild populations to support the development of good genotypes, and evaluated the effectiveness of traditional crossbreeding, marker-assisted selection (MAS), and modern genomic tools such as CRISPR-Cas9 in improving these medicinal traits.The production of active compounds has been optimized through traditional breeding methods such as genotype selection and hybridization, combined with advanced technologies such as genome selection and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.Despite breeding and regulatory challenges, the study concludes that breeding programs that combine traditional and modern techniques hold great promise in enhancing the medicinal value of honeysuckle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".