MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402622484 · doi:10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.08.007

Astrocytes originated from neural stem cells drive the regenerative remodeling of pathologic CSPGs in spinal cord injury

2024· article· en· W4402622484 on OpenAlexafffund
Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini, Shiva Nemati, Soheila Karimi‐Abdolrezaee

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMesenchymal stem cell research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
KeywordsBiologySpinal cord injuryNeural stem cellSpinal cordStem cellRegeneration (biology)NeuroscienceAnatomyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural degeneration is a hallmark of spinal cord injury (SCI). Multipotent neural precursor cells (NPCs) have the potential to reconstruct the damaged neuron-glia network due to their tri-lineage capacity to generate neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. However, astrogenesis is the predominant fate of resident or transplanted NPCs in the SCI milieu adding to the abundant number of resident astrocytes in the lesion. How NPC-derived astrocytes respond to the inflammatory milieu of SCI and the mechanisms by which they contribute to the post-injury recovery processes remain largely unknown. Here, we uncover that activated NPC-derived astrocytes exhibit distinct molecular signature that is immune modulatory and foster neurogenesis, neuronal maturity, and synaptogenesis. Mechanistically, NPC-derived astrocytes perform regenerative matrix remodeling by clearing inhibitory chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) from the injury milieu through LAR and PTP-σ receptor-mediated endocytosis and the production of ADAMTS1 and ADAMTS9, while most resident astrocytes are pro-inflammatory and contribute to the pathologic deposition of CSPGs. These novel findings unravel critical mechanisms of NPC-mediated astrogenesis in SCI repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ReportsSame topicMesenchymal stem cell researchFrench-language works237,207