MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402626816 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2024.3464512

Knowledge-Aware Parameter Coaching for Communication-Efficient Personalized Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Computing

2024· article· en· W4402626816 on OpenAlexaff
Mingjian Zhi, Yuanguo Bi, Lin Cai, Wenchao Xu, Haozhao Wang, Tianao Xiang, Qiang He

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRecommender Systems and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCoachingMobile computingEdge computingMobile edge computingMobile telephonyEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionMultimediaMobile deviceComputer networkDistributed computingWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceMobile radio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Personalized Federated Learning (pFL) can improve the accuracy of local models and provide enhanced edge intelligence without exposing the raw data in Mobile Edge Computing (MEC). However, in the MEC environment with constrained communication resources, transmitting the entire model between the server and the clients in traditional pFL methods imposes substantial communication overhead, which can lead to inaccurate personalization and degraded performance of mobile clients. In response, we propose a Communication-Efficient pFL architecture to enhance the performance of personalized models while minimizing communication overhead in MEC. First, a Knowledge-Aware Parameter Coaching method (KAPC) is presented to produce a more accurate personalized model by utilizing the layer-wise parameters of other clients with adaptive aggregation weights. Then, convergence analysis of the proposed KAPC is developed in both the convex and non-convex settings. Second, a Bidirectional Layer Selection algorithm (BLS) based on self-relationship and generalization error is proposed to select the most informative layers for transmission, which reduces communication costs. Extensive experiments are conducted, and the results demonstrate that the proposed KAPC achieves superior accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art baselines, while the proposed BLS substantially improves resource utilization without sacrificing performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicRecommender Systems and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207