Knowledge-Aware Parameter Coaching for Communication-Efficient Personalized Federated Learning in Mobile Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Personalized Federated Learning (pFL) can improve the accuracy of local models and provide enhanced edge intelligence without exposing the raw data in Mobile Edge Computing (MEC). However, in the MEC environment with constrained communication resources, transmitting the entire model between the server and the clients in traditional pFL methods imposes substantial communication overhead, which can lead to inaccurate personalization and degraded performance of mobile clients. In response, we propose a Communication-Efficient pFL architecture to enhance the performance of personalized models while minimizing communication overhead in MEC. First, a Knowledge-Aware Parameter Coaching method (KAPC) is presented to produce a more accurate personalized model by utilizing the layer-wise parameters of other clients with adaptive aggregation weights. Then, convergence analysis of the proposed KAPC is developed in both the convex and non-convex settings. Second, a Bidirectional Layer Selection algorithm (BLS) based on self-relationship and generalization error is proposed to select the most informative layers for transmission, which reduces communication costs. Extensive experiments are conducted, and the results demonstrate that the proposed KAPC achieves superior accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art baselines, while the proposed BLS substantially improves resource utilization without sacrificing performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".