The aryl hydrocarbon receptor in environmentally induced cervical cancer: A Narrative review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) plays a crucial role in cellular responses to various environmental pollutants, including several known carcinogens. As a ligand-activated transcription factor, AhR activation modulates the expression of genes involved in critical cellular processes, including detoxification pathways, cell proliferation and differentiation, and immune system regulation. The AhR exhibits pleiotropic effects under normal physiological conditions, contributing to the development and function of various organ systems. AhR activity is important in angiogenesis, cardiomyocyte differentiation, oocyte maturation, oculomotor nerve formation, and hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Additionally, AhR plays a role in regulating immune cell differentiation and function, maintaining the integrity of the intestinal epithelium and its associated immune system, and mediating UVB-induced DNA damage repair responses in the skin. It acts as a critical environmental sensor, mediating cellular responses to various exogenous ligands. Importantly, activation or inhibition of AhR affects distinct signaling pathways depending on the specific ligand and cellular context. Ligands for the AhR are divided into exogenous or endogenous and have agonistic or antagonistic activity. Recently, the AhR role was determined in cancer development. It can exert both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressive effects depending on factors such as the specific ligand, cell type, and tissue microenvironment. Emerging evidence suggests that AhR may represent a promising target for immunotherapy and serve as a potential biomarker for cervical cancer. AhR interacts with apoptotic pathway, immune checkpoint system, steroid hormones, and immune cell regulation process in cervical cancer. Despite its potential significance, the precise role of AhR in cervical cancer development and progression is still unknown. In this review, we describe significant roles of AhR in gynecological cancers; e.g., in cervical cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".