Manajemen Risiko pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Bendung Batang Pagian Kabupaten Dharmasraya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Risks in construction project work are events or occurrences that are uncertain but can have a positive or negative impact on the sustainability of a project. In this research, the author carried out an analysis of risks, impacts and risk responses caused by failure in the construction work of the Batang Pangian weir construction project. The aim is to identify potential risks and the impact of risks that occur in the implementation of the Batang Pagian weir project work, as well as to obtain risk responses that can be carried out. The research was conducted qualitatively through field surveys and interviews with respondents involved in the field. Next, a risk assessment was carried out referring to the Godfrey development method. Based on the results of research analysis, it was found that the flood disaster was the main trigger for failure in the implementation of construction work for the Batang Pangian Dam. The impact of the flood disaster resulted in the main irrigation canal being closed so that water flow became obstructed and had an impact on the agricultural sector. The risk responses carried out include creating alternative channels and conducting outreach to the community regarding this problem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".