MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402628093 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2024.3456690

High-Efficiency Wide Input Power Range Three-Phase Radio Frequency Energy Harvester for IoT Applications

2024· article· en· W4402628093 on OpenAlexaff
Akram Refaei, Sebastien Genevey, Yves Audet, Yvon Savaria

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadio frequencyEnergy harvestingElectrical engineeringRange (aeronautics)Electronic engineeringEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Computer scienceEfficient energy useEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The need for efficient and high-performance energy harvesting systems is rising to power modern wearable smart devices. Several energy sources can be harvested such as thermal, vibrational, and ambient radio frequency (RF). RF energy harvesters (RFEHs) are widely adopted as they wirelessly deliver power. This article proposes a new RFEH design based on the three-phase rectifier topology. The rectifier is integrated with a custom-designed phase shifter that can split received power equally and deliver three signals with a 120° phase shift at the same moment. Due to their low forward drop voltage and high sensitivity, the rectifier diodes are chosen to be Schottky diodes SMS7621-005LF from Skyworks. A prototype is fabricated on an RT/Duroid 5880 Laminates substrate with 0.005 in thickness to reduce the dielectric losses. The RF energy harvester shows promising results in the ISM band at a 435.6 MHz frequency. At 8 dBm available RF power, the prototype demonstrates a high efficiency of 56% end to end at 6 k$\Omega $load and 5.2 V output voltage. In addition, the system maintains an efficiency higher than 20% over a wide available input power range (IPR) of 28 dBm. The RFEH reports a 1 V sensitivity at −10 dBm. This system is ideal for supplying ambient sensor nodes and systems-on-chip (SoCs) in urban areas where RF electromagnetic waves are widely available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207