MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The critical role of interfaces in advanced Li-ion battery technology: A comprehensive review

2024· review· en· W4402629052 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohamed Djihad Bouguern, Anil Kumar M R, Karim Zaghib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Power Sources · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersConcordia University
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Materials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsThermodynamicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The passivation layer in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), commonly known as the Solid Electrolyte Interphase (SEI) layer, is crucial for their functionality and longevity. This layer forms on the anode during initial charging to avoid ongoing electrolyte decomposition and stabilize the anode-electrolyte interface. However, repeated charging and discharging can destabilize the SEI, thereby increasing internal resistance and reducing capacity. Similarly, the Cathode Electrolyte Interphase (CEI) layer is crucial for the performance, safety, and durability of LIBs. The formation, stability, and evolution of the SEI and CEI layers are critical for the efficiency and lifespan of LIBs. Research has focused on optimizing these interphases through advanced materials , interface modifications, and improved electrolyte formulations. Enhancing our understanding of SEI and CEI formation and degradation can lead to significant advancements in LIB performance, lifespan, and safety, thereby satisfying the demands for high-performance power storage in electronic appliances and electric vehicles. Future innovations promise to improve energy density , charge-discharge efficiency, and overall battery reliability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Power SourcesSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207