MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402631449 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad7d5a

Relative biological effectiveness of clinically relevant photon energies for the survival of human colorectal, cervical, and prostate cancer cell lines

2024· article· en· W4402631449 on OpenAlexafffund
Joanna Li, Naim Chabaytah, Joud Babik, Behnaz Behmand, Hamed Bekerat, Tanner Connell, Michael D. Evans, R. Ruo, T. Vuong, Shirin A. Enger

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
FundersInstitut TransMedTechMEDTEQ+Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRelative biological effectivenessRadiosensitivityHeLaNuclear medicineRadioresistanceProstate cancerRadiobiologyBrachytherapyClonogenic assayIrradiationRadiation therapyCervical cancerCancerLinear energy transferCancer researchDosimetryMedicineCellChemistryPhysicsInternal medicineNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) differs between radiation qualities. However, an RBE of 1.0 has been established for photons regardless of the wide range of photon energies used clinically, the lack of reproducibility in radiobiological studies, and outdated reference energies used in the experimental literature. Moreover, due to intrinsic radiosensitivity, different cancer types have different responses to radiation. This study aimed to characterize the RBE of clinically relevant high and low photon energies in vitro for three human cancer cell lines: HCT116 (colon), HeLa (cervix), and PC3 (prostate). Approach. Experiments were conducted following dosimetry protocols provided by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Cells were irradiated with 6 MV x-rays, an 192Ir brachytherapy source, 225 kVp and 50 kVp x-rays. Cell survival post-irradiation was assessed using the clonogenic assay. Survival fractions were fitted using the linear quadratic model, and survival curves were generated for RBE calculations. Main results. Cell killing was more efficient with decreasing photon energy. Using 225 kVp x-rays as the reference, the HCT116 RBESF0.1 for 6 MV x-rays, 192Ir, and 50 kVp x-rays were 0.89 ± 0.03, 0.95 ± 0.03, and 1.24 ± 0.04; the HeLa RBESF0.1 were 0.95 ± 0.04, 0.97 ± 0.05, and 1.09 ± 0.03, and the PC3 RBESF0.1 were 0.84 ± 0.01, 0.84 ± 0.01, and 1.13 ± 0.02, respectively. HeLa and PC3 cells had varying radiosensitivity when irradiated with 225 and 50 kVp x-rays. Significance. This difference supports the notion that RBE may not be 1.0 for all photons through experimental investigations that employed precise dosimetry. It highlights that different cancer types may not have identical responses to the same irradiation quality. Additionally, the RBE of clinically relevant photons was updated to the reference energy of 225 kVp x-rays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and BiologySame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207