MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402633395 · doi:10.54932/vbqe7739

Autonomie financière et activités d’exportation des PME du secteur bioalimentaire : Planifier adéquatement les dépenses à engager

2024· report· fr· W4402633395 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josée St‐Pierre, Annie Royer, Crispin A. Enagogo, Jean Pierre Dany Menguele

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'industrie bioalimentaire revêt une importance capitale dans l'économie québécoise et joue un rôle majeur dans son identité culturelle. Elle englobe un large éventail d'activités liées à la production, à la transformation, à la distribution et à la consommation d'aliments et de boissons provenant à la fois de l'agriculture biologique et de l'agriculture conventionnelle. En 2021, la contribution de l'industrie bioalimentaire au produit intérieur brut du Québec était estimée à plus de 6 % de l'économie. Les exportations bioalimentaires du Québec ont atteint un record de 11,4 milliards de dollars en 2022. Cependant, les PME sont toujours sous-représentées parmi les entreprises exportatrices. Cette sous-représentation peut découler d’enjeux financiers importants et propres aux PME et autres particularités du secteur bioalimentaire en matière d'exportation. Dans cette étude, les auteurs approfondissent les connaissances sur les enjeux financiers des activités d’exportation des PME qui peuvent se révéler critiques à tout moment du processus, afin de proposer un outil d’aide à la planification des différentes dépenses que les PME seraient susceptibles d’engager.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgriculture and Rural Development Research→French-language works237,207→