MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesis and crystallographic investigation of dicobalt tetrahedrane complexes ligated by 2-butyne-1,4-diol. In silico evaluation of their efficiency as anticancer metallodrugs

2024· article· en· W4402633894 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ahmed Said Mohamed, Isabelle Jourdain, Michael Knorr, Stephanie Beffy, Abdirahman Elmi, Farhan Siddique, Samir Chtita, Carsten Strohmann, Annika Schmidt, Mostafa A. Hussien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Structure · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMetal complexes synthesis and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversité de Franche-ComtéConseil régional de Bourgogne-Franche-ComtéAgence Universitaire de la Francophonie
KeywordsChemistryIn silicoCombinatorial chemistryDiolNanotechnologyStereochemistryOrganic chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Synthesis and spectroscopic characterization of a series of 2-butyn-1,4-diol and acetylenic dithioether-based dicobalt tetrahedranes. • Intra- and intermolecular interactions studies based on single-crystal X-ray diffraction including Hirshfeld analyses. • Evaluation of the anticancer efficacy of the Co 2 tetrahedrane series against prostate, breast and liver cancers through in silico docking simulations with five protein residues. • The most potent candidates as homobimetallic metallodrugs are the diphosphine- and P(OAr) 3 -substituted derivatives. A series of dicobalt carbonyl dimetallatetrahedranes of type [Co 2 (CO) 4 L 2 (µ-HOCH 2 C CCH 2 OH)] (L = CO, P(OR) 3 ; L 2 = Ph 2 PN(H)PPh 2 , Ph 2 PN(Me)PPh 2 , Ph 2 PCH 2 PPh 2 ), ligated by 1,4-butynediol (BUD) was synthesized and structurally characterized at 100 K by single-crystal X-ray diffraction to analyze in addition to the molecular architectures their propensity to generate intra- and intermolecular secondary interactions. For several selected examples, also Hirshfeld surface analyses have been performed. To evaluate the replacement of OH vs. SR, this series of BUD-based dimetallatetrahedranes ( 1 - 3 ) was completed by the preparation of the structurally related complexes [Co 2 (CO) 4 L 2 (µ-RSCH 2 C CCH 2 SR)] ( 4 - 5 ). The crystallographically characterized complex [Co 2 (CO) 4 {P(OPh) 3 } 2 (µ- t- BuSCH 2 C CCH 2 SBu- t )] ( 4 ) was obtained in a Nicholas-type reaction between [Co 2 (CO) 4 {P(OPh) 3 } 2 (µ-HOCH 2 C CCH 2 OH)] ( 2a ) and t -BuSH. Alternatatively, the latter series 4-5 was obtained in much improved yield by direct treatment of [Co 2 (CO) 6 L 2 ] with the thioether-functionalized alkynes RSCH 2 C CCH 2 SR (R = t -Bu, Ph, Bz). The experimental crystallographic data were compared with those obtained by DFT computing. The anticancer capacity of this series of compounds was evaluated against prostate, breast and liver cancers through in silico docking simulations. Some compounds displayed docking scores against prostate, breast, and liver cancer proteins in the range between -4.91 – -11.01 kcal/mol, indicating a potential as bimetallic metallodrugs in cancer therapy, deserving more detailed in vitro investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular StructureSame topicMetal complexes synthesis and propertiesFrench-language works237,207