Modeling Cystic Fibrosis Chronic Infection Using Engineered Mucus-like Hydrogels
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The airway mucus of patients with cystic fibrosis has altered properties, which create a microenvironment primed for chronic infections that are difficult to treat. These complex polymicrobial airway infections and corresponding mammalian-microbe interactions are challenging to model in vitro. Here, we report the development of mucus-like hydrogels with varied compositions and viscoelastic properties reflecting differences between healthy and cystic fibrosis airway mucus. Models of cystic fibrosis and healthy airway microenvironments were created by combining the hydrogels with relevant pathogens, human bronchial epithelial cells, and an antibiotic. Notably, pathogen antibiotic resistance was not solely dependent on the altered properties of the mucus-like hydrogels but was also influenced by culture conditions including microbe species, monomicrobial or polymicrobial culture, and the presence of epithelial cells. Additionally, the cystic fibrosis airway model showed the ability to mimic features characteristic of chronic cystic fibrosis airway infections including sustained polymicrobial growth and increased antibiotic tolerance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it