Mitochondrial superoxide acts in the intestine to extend longevity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive oxygen containing molecules that are generated by normal metabolism. While ROS can cause damage to the building blocks that make up cells, these molecules can also act as intracellular signals that promote longevity. The levels of ROS within the cell can be regulated by antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), which converts superoxide to hydrogen peroxide. Interestingly, our previous work has shown that disruption of the mitochondrial SOD gene sod-2 results in increased lifespan, indicating that elevating levels of mitochondrial superoxide can promote longevity. To explore the molecular mechanisms involved, we determined the tissues in which disruption of sod-2 is necessary for lifespan extension and the tissues in which disruption of sod-2 is sufficient to extend lifespan. We found that tissue-specific restoration of SOD-2 expression in worms lacking SOD-2 could partially revert changes in fertility, embryonic lethality and resistance to stress, but did not inhibit the effects of sod-2 deletion on lifespan. Knocking down sod-2 expression using RNA interference specifically in the intestine, but not other tissues, was sufficient to extend longevity. Intestine-specific knockdown of sod-2 also increased resistance to heat stress and while decreasing resistance to oxidative stress. Combined, these results indicate that disruption of sod-2 in neurons, intestine, germline, or muscle is not required for lifespan extension, but that decreasing sod-2 expression in just the intestine extends lifespan. This work defines the conditions required for elevated mitochondrial superoxide to increase longevity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".