MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402637973 · doi:10.4050/f-0073-2017-12187

Wind Tunnel Testing for the SB>1 Defiant Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator

2017· article· en· W4402637973 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind tunnelJoint (building)Computer scienceEngineeringAerospace engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind tunnel tests have been conducted to support development of the SB>1 DEFIANT™ Joint Multi-Role Technology Demonstrator. The objective is to provide data to validate and enhance the aerodynamic performance and flight dynamics models and to improve understanding of the aerodynamics of X2 TECHNOLOGY™ configurations. The first model was a 1/11 scale airframe with a powered propeller that was tested in the United Technologies Research Center (UTRC) Pilot Wind Tunnel (PWT) in 2013-2014. The second model was a 1/5 scale airframe with a powered coaxial main rotor that was tested at the U.S. Air Force National Full Scale Aerodynamic Complex (NFAC) in 2016. This model could also be tested with a powered propeller. Measurements included forces and moments on the various components, as well as fuselage, empennage, and blade surface pressures. For the 1/11 model, fuselage-induced flow fields at the propeller and empennage locations were also measured. Application of the experimental results to the State Space GenHel flight dynamics model is described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207