MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402639430 · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad7b99

Characterizing gravitational wave detector networks: from A<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>♯</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math>to cosmic explorer

2024· article· en· W4402639430 on OpenAlex
Ish Gupta, Chaitanya Afle, K. G. Arun, Ananya Bandopadhyay, Masha Baryakhtar, S. Biscoveanu, Ssohrab Borhanian, Floor S. Broekgaarden, Alessandra Corsi, Arnab Dhani, M. Evans, E. D. Hall, O. A. Hannuksela, Keisi Kacanja, Rahul Kashyap, Sanika Khadkikar, K. Kuns, Tjonnie G. F. Li, A. L. Miller, A. Nitz, B. J. Owen, C. Palomba, Anthony Pearce, Hemantakumar Phurailatpam, J. Read, Joseph D. Romano, B. S. Sathyaprakash, D. H. Shoemaker, D. Singh, S. Vitale, L. Barsotti, Emanuele Berti, C. Cahillane, Hsin-Yu Chen, P. Fritschel, C.‐J. Haster, Philippe Landry, Geoffrey Lovelace, D. E. McClelland, B. J. J. Slagmolen, J. R. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, L. Sun, D. B. Tanner, Hiroaki Yamamoto, M. E. Zucker

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersDivision of Astronomical SciencesHigh Energy PhysicsDivision of PhysicsUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen Leuven, KU LeuvenChinese University of Hong KongKU LeuvenDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaVlaamse regeringScience and Engineering Research BoardIndo-US Science and Technology ForumNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationMinistero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione InternazionaleU.S. Department of EnergyNASA HeadquartersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGravitational waveCOSMIC cancer databaseDetectorCosmic rayGravitational-wave observatoryAstronomyNuclear physicsGravitationAstrophysicsParticle physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Gravitational-wave observations by the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory (LIGO) and Virgo have provided us a new tool to explore the Universe on all scales from nuclear physics to the cosmos and have the massive potential to further impact fundamental physics, astrophysics, and cosmology for decades to come. In this paper we have studied the science capabilities of a network of LIGO detectors when they reach their best possible sensitivity, called A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>♯</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> , given the infrastructure in which they exist and a new generation of observatories that are factor of 10 to 100 times more sensitive (depending on the frequency), in particular a pair of L-shaped cosmic explorer (CE) observatories (one 40 km and one 20 km arm length) in the US and the triangular Einstein telescope with 10 km arms in Europe. We use a set of science metrics derived from the top priorities of several funding agencies to characterize the science capabilities of different networks. The presence of one or two A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>♯</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> observatories in a network containing two or one next generation observatories, respectively, will provide good localization capabilities for facilitating multimessenger astronomy (MMA) and precision measurement of the Hubble parameter. Two CE observatories are indispensable for achieving precise localization of binary neutron star events, facilitating detection of electromagnetic counterparts and transforming MMA. Their combined operation is even more important in the detection and localization of high-redshift sources, such as binary neutron stars, beyond the star-formation peak, and primordial black hole mergers, which may occur roughly 100 million years after the Big Bang. The addition of the Einstein Telescope to a network of two CE observatories is critical for accomplishing all the identified science metrics including the nuclear equation of state, cosmological parameters, the growth of black holes through cosmic history, but also make new discoveries such as the presence of dark matter within or around neutron stars and black holes, continuous gravitational waves from rotating neutron stars, transient signals from supernovae, and the production of stellar-mass black holes in the early Universe. For most metrics the triple network of next generation terrestrial observatories are a factor 100 better than what can be accomplished by a network of three A <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow/><mml:mo>♯</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math> observatories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it