MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402639901 · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000006417

Risk Stratification and Management of Acute Respiratory Failure in Patients With Neuromuscular Disease

2024· review· en· W4402639901 on OpenAlex
Erica McKenzie, Julie Kromm, Theodore Mobach, Kevin Solverson, Joshua Waite, Alejandro A. Rabinstein

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNeuromuscular diseaseRisk stratificationRespiratory failureIntensive care medicineAcute respiratory failureRespiratory systemStratification (seeds)DiseaseCardiologyInternal medicineMechanical ventilation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and myasthenia gravis (MG) are the most common causes of acute neuromuscular respiratory failure resulting in ICU admission. This synthetic narrative review summarizes the evidence for the prediction and management of acute neuromuscular respiratory failure due to GBS and MG. DATA SOURCES: We searched PubMed for relevant literature and reviewed bibliographies of included articles for additional relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: English-language publications were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Data regarding study methodology, patient population, evaluation metrics, respiratory interventions, and clinical outcomes were qualitatively assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: No single tool has sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of acute neuromuscular respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Multimodal assessment, integrating history, examination maneuvers (single breath count, neck flexion strength, bulbar weakness, and paradoxical breathing) and pulmonary function testing are ideal for risk stratification. The Erasmus GBS Respiratory Insufficiency Score is a validated tool useful for GBS. Noninvasive ventilation can be effective in MG but may not be safe in early GBS. Airway management considerations are similar across both conditions, but dysautonomia in GBS requires specific attention. Extubation failure is common in MG, and early tracheostomy may be beneficial for MG. Prolonged ventilatory support is common, and good functional outcomes may occur even when prolonged ventilation is required. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal assessments integrating several bedside indicators of bulbar and respiratory muscle function can aid in evidence-based risk stratification for respiratory failure among those with neuromuscular disease. Serial evaluations may help establish a patient's trajectory and to determine timing of respiratory intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.800
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it