MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402641642 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.556

Output-Only Identification of Lur’e Systems with Prandtl-Ishlinskii Hysteresis Nonlinearities

2024· article· en· W4402641642 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHysteresisIdentification (biology)Prandtl numberControl theory (sociology)MathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceMechanicsCondensed matter physicsConvectionBiologyControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lur’e systems are dynamical systems that are characterized by the feedback interconnection between a linear, time-invariant system and a feedback nonlinearity. Lur’e systems have been used to characterize the dynamics of several systems including gas turbine combustors and self-oscillatory systems. In this paper, we introduce an Identification algorithm for Lur’e systems with hysteretic feedback nonlinearities. We assume that the input to the Lur’e system is an unknown constant signal, and the linear dynamics have nonzero initial conditions. First, we use least squares with a transfer function model to identify the linear dynamics of the Lur’e system. Then, we use the identified linear dynamics along with the measured output to construct an estimate of the hysteretic nonlinearity. We show numerical examples to illustrate the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it