A data envelopment analysis model for optimizing transfer time of ischemic stroke patients under endovascular thrombectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study applies Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to optimize transfer times and futile transfers of eligible ischemic stroke patients receiving Endovascular Thrombosis (EVT) in Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) in Nova Scotia. The study aims to assess healthcare delivery in Nova Scotia over two periods. It seeks to improve stroke care for rural populations by examining nine inputs, including age and distance between PSCs and the Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC) that provided EVT treatment, concerning a single output variable: whether EVT is performed or not. In the first phase, 115 patients were treated as Decision-Making Units (DMUs) for ten PSCs by applying an input-oriented Variable Returns to Scale (VRS) assisted by super-efficiency analysis using the Python-based PyDEA tool. This tool is known for its unrestricted capacity to handle DMUs, inputs, and outputs. In the second phase, eight PSCs with low patient numbers were merged into four DMUs, each consisting of two PSCs. These two merged PSCs have limited patients, and the selected PSCs are also geographically close. Two PSCs have been kept separate because they had sufficient patient volume. In the first phase, VRS generated more reasonable efficiency scores for evaluation, while in the second phase, Constant Returns to Scale (CRS) outperformed VRS, yielding better results. In the initial stage of the second phase, ten PSCs were considered as six DMUs using the input-oriented CRS and VRS for 115 patients. Super-efficiency measures were applied in this stage to improve the evaluation process further. In the second part of the second phase, a comparison between the first period (2018–2019) and the second period (2020–2021) was conducted using the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI), considering CRS and VRS to evaluate the relative efficiency and productivity change of six DMUs over time. • Use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to optimize stroke patient transfer times under endovascular thrombectomy. • Examine 115 patients who attended ten primary stroke centers by variable returns to scale and super efficiency. • Merge stroke centers into four decision-making units using constant returns to scale. • Assess the impact of geographic proximity on efficiency and the Malmquist productivity index over time. • Use Python DEA (PyDEA) and performance improvement management DEA (PIM-DEA) to refine the evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".