MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402645290 · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-03871-3

A global dataset of gross nitrogen transformation rates across terrestrial ecosystems

2024· article· en· W4402645290 on OpenAlexaff
Eunji Byun, Christoph Müller, Barbara Parisse, Rosario Napoli, Jinbo Zhang, Fereidoun Rezanezhad, Philippe Van Cappellen, Gerald M. Moser, Anne Jansen‐Willems, Wendy H. Yang, Rieko Urakawa, José Ignacio Arroyo, Ulderico Neri, Ahmed S. Elrys, Pierfrancesco Nardi

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Data · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Research Foundation of KoreaYonsei UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEcosystemEnvironmental scienceTransformation (genetics)Terrestrial ecosystemNitrogenNitrogen cycleEcologyBiologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rates of nitrogen transformations support quantitative descriptions and predictive understanding of the complex nitrogen cycle, but measuring these rates is expensive and not readily available to researchers. Here, we compiled a dataset of gross nitrogen transformation rates (GNTR) of mineralization, nitrification, ammonium immobilization, nitrate immobilization, and dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium in terrestrial ecosystems. Data were extracted from 331 studies published from 1984-2022, covering 581 sites. Globally, 1552 observations were appended with standardized soil, vegetation, and climate data (49 variables in total) potentially contributing to the observed variations of GNTR. We used machine learning-based data imputation to fill in partially missing GNTR, which improved statistical relationships between theoretically correlated processes. The dataset is currently the most comprehensive overview of terrestrial ecosystem GNTR and serves as a global synthesis of the extent and variability of GNTR across a wide range of environmental conditions. Future research can utilize the dataset to identify measurement gaps with respect to climate, soil, and ecosystem types, delineate GNTR for certain ecoregions, and help validate process-based models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.362
Threshold uncertainty score0.663

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific DataSame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207