MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402647888 · doi:10.55214/25768484.v8i4.1589

Empirical analysis of electricity demand in Albania. the impact in ecosystem

2024· article· en· W4402647888 on OpenAlexaff
Valbona Karapici, Doriana Matraku, Arsena Gjipali

Bibliographic record

VenueEdelweiss Applied Science and Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectricity demandElectricityEcosystemNatural resource economicsEnvironmental scienceEconomicsBusinessEnvironmental economicsAgricultural economicsElectricity generationEcologyEngineeringPower (physics)Biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Albania represents the case of a developing country with a volatile demand for power facing an unstable domestic supply, especially during the last decade. Understanding future patterns of electricity usage is crucial in various planning contexts, the most important of which would be security of supply. In this framework, acknowledging the future national demand for electricity is needed for electricity providers for them to plan the sufficient and security of electricity supply. The aim of this paper is electricity demand modelling and forecasting in Albania. The model developed for the determinants of electricity demand for Albania allows understanding of the patterns of consumption behaviour. The main demand drivers of the electric consumption considered here are macroeconomic and demographic factors. The current work empirically estimates that the main determinants of electricity consumption in Albania for the period 1990-2014 are GDP, population and remittances. Results coefficients are then used to forecast electricity consumption for the period 2015-2030. We believe that the main contribution of the proposed estimation forecasts would be for correctly informing policy makers regarding electricity demand patterns in Albania and in forming expectations on a vital sector such as electricity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdelweiss Applied Science and TechnologySame topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207