MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402649380 · doi:10.1364/oe.523615

Efficient and widely tunable mid-infrared sources using GaAs and AlGaAs integrated platforms for second-order frequency conversion

2024· article· en· W4402649380 on OpenAlexaff
Emil Z. Ulsig, Magnus Madsen, Eric J. Stanton, Dileep V. Reddy, A. Leger, Simon Sørensen, Pedro Godoy, Iterio Degli-Eredi, Martin J. Stevens, Deny R. Hamel, Lynden K. Shalm, Richard P. Mirin, Nicolas Volet

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsGenia Photonics (Canada)Université de Moncton
FundersInnovationsfonden
KeywordsOpticsInfraredOptoelectronicsFrequency conversionSum-frequency generationMaterials scienceIntegrated opticsNonlinear opticsPhysicsLaserElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integrated coherent mid-infrared (mid-IR) sources are crucial for spectroscopy and quantum frequency conversion (QFC) to facilitate scalable fiber-based application of single photons. Direct mid-IR emission with broad tunability poses fundamental challenges from the gain media and mirror components. This paper presents a characterization of a second-order nonlinear platform. It showcases a mid-IR parametric coherent source with a continuous tuning range exceeding 230 nm centered around 2425 nm, achieved through difference-frequency generation (DFG). The nonlinear coefficient d 14 of gallium arsenide (GaAs) and aluminum gallium arsenide (AlGaAs) on insulator is experimentally determined via second-harmonic generation (SHG) in waveguides of various lengths, and the tolerance of the process is investigated. These materials are explored for their high conversion efficiency, utilizing monolithic epitaxial quantum dots and integrated waveguides for QFC. The results demonstrate efficient and tunable mid-IR emission suitable for compact, scalable quantum emitters, with applications in environmental and health monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207