MEPO-ML: a robust graph attention network model for rapid generation of partial atomic charges in metal-organic frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accurate computation of the gas adsorption properties of MOFs is usually bottlenecked by the DFT calculations required to generate partial atomic charges. Therefore, large virtual screenings of MOFs often use the QEq method which is rapid, but of limited accuracy. Recently, machine learning (ML) models have been trained to generate charges in much better agreement with DFT-derived charges compared to the QEq models. Previous ML charge models for MOFs have all used training sets with less than 3000 MOFs obtained from the CoRE MOF database, which has recently been shown to have high structural error rates. In this work, we developed a graph attention network model for predicting DFT-derived charges in MOFs where the model was developed with the ARC-MOF database that contains 279,632 MOFs and over 40 million charges. This model, which we call MEPO-ML , predicts charges with a mean absolute error of 0.025e on our test set of over 27 K MOFs. Other ML models reported in the literature were also trained using the same dataset and descriptors, and MEPO-ML was shown to give the lowest errors. The gas adsorption properties evaluated using MEPO-ML charges are found to be in significantly better agreement with the reference DFT-derived charges compared to the empirical charges, for both polar and non-polar gases. Using only a single CPU core on our benchmark computer, MEPO-ML charges can be generated in less than two seconds on average (including all computations required to apply the model) for MOFs in the test set of 27 K MOFs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".