Case study on a contaminated soil landfill in Canada with a focus on geosynthetic materials and electrical leak location
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Designing a double-lined landfill for contaminated soils certainly presents several challenges. Many design aspects are taken into consideration to comply with local regulations, including thickness of the natural clay layer, minimal slopes for leachate drainage, side slopes for soil stability, global design to lower stress on the geosynthetics, and much more. We will focus on the choice of geosynthetics used for the construction of a cell on a contaminated soil landfill during the summer of 2023, as well as quality control and quality assurance, including electrical leak location. A multi-linear drainage geocomposite was selected to cover each layer of an HDPE geomembrane and a layer of natural sand was also installed. It was not practical to use sand on the secondary geomembrane in the slopes due to stability and damaging risks, therefore the drainage system solely relied on the drainage geocomposite. To carry on with the electrical leak location, a conductive mesh was added to the geocomposite installed in the slopes, allowing 100% of the installed geomembrane to be tested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".