MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402656187 · doi:10.1017/s1474747223000215

Social security and retirement around the world: lessons from a long-term collaboration

2024· article· en· W4402656187 on OpenAlexaff
Courtney Coile, David A. Wise, Axel Börsch‐Supan, Jonathan Gruber, Kevin Milligan, Richard G. Woodbury, Michael Baker, James Banks, Luc Behaghel, Mélika Ben Salem, Paul Bingley, Didier Blanchet, Richard Blundell, Michele Boldrín, Antoine Bozio, Agar Brugiavini, Tabea Bucher‐Koenen, Raluca Elena Buia, Eve Caroli, Thierry Debrand, Arnaud Déllis, Raphaël Desmet, Klaas de Vos, Peter Diamond, Carl Emmerson, Irene Ferrari, Anne-Lore Fraikin, Mayu Fujii, Pilar García‐Gómez, Sílvia Garcia‐Mandicó, Nicolas Goll, Nabanita Datta Gupta, Sergi Jiménez‐Martín, Per Johansson, Paul Johnson, Michael Søgaard Jørgensen, Alain Jousten, Hendrik Jürges, Malene Kallestrup‐Lamb, Adriaan Kalwij, Arie Kapteyn, Simone Kohnz, Lisa Laun, Mathieu Lefèbvre, Ronan Mahieu, Giovanni Mastrobuoni, Costas Meghir, Akiko Oishi, Takashi Oshio, Mårten Palme, Giacomo Pasini, Peder J. Pedersen, Louis-Paul Pele, Franco Peracchi, Sergio Perelman, Pierre Pestieau, Corinne Prost, Simon Rabaté, Johannes Rausch, Muriel Roger, Tammy Schirle, Reinhold Schnabel, Morten Schuth, Satoshi Shimizutani, Sarah Smith, Jean-Philippe Stijns, David Sturrock, Ingemar Svensson, Gemma Tetlow, Lars Thiel, Maxime Tô, Julie Tréguier, Emiko Usui, Judit Vall Castelló, Emmanuelle Walraet, Guglielmo Weber, Naohiro Yashiro

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pensions Economics and Finance · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of TorontoWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversiteit UtrechtNational Institute on AgingAlfred P. Sloan FoundationNetwork for Studies on Pensions, Aging and RetirementU.S. Social Security AdministrationAustralian Government
KeywordsSocial securityTerm (time)BusinessPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Declining labor force participation of older men throughout the 20th century and recent increases in participation have generated substantial interest in understanding the effect of public pensions on retirement. The National Bureau of Economic Research's International Social Security (ISS) Project, a long-term collaboration among researchers in a dozen developed countries, has explored this and related questions. The project employs a harmonized approach to conduct within-country analyses that are combined for meaningful cross-country comparisons. The key lesson is that the choices of policy makers affect the incentive to work at older ages and these incentives have important effects on retirement behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.010
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pensions Economics and FinanceSame topicRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207