Effect of frailty, activity of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living and age on cognition of community-dwelling elderly people: a cross-sectional study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ageing is the main indicator of cognitive impairment and can affect activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) and frailty. The objective of this study was to verify the interference of IADLs, ADLs, frailty status and age on the cognition of community-dwelling elderly people. Were used the follow tools: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa); Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS); Lawton scale and Barthel scale. All subjects included were community residents, aged 60 and over, both sexes. To evaluate the effect of age group and frailty status on cognition was used ANCOVA with Bonferroni post-test. Correlations were made using the Pearson test. Values of p <0.05 were accepted as significant. A relationship was observed between all independent variables and cognition (p <0.0001) and was observed an effect of age and frailty on cognition (p <0.001). There is an association between frailty, age, IADL and ADL with the cognition, and were found that the age group and frailty status interfere on cognitive impairment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".