MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402658267 · doi:10.1112/plms.12638

Wiener densities for the Airy line ensemble

2024· article· en· W4402658267 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsLine (geometry)Statistical physicsGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The parabolic Airy line ensemble is a central limit object in the KPZ (Kardar–Parisi–Zhang) universality class and related areas. On any compact set , the law of the recentered ensemble has a density with respect to the law of independent Brownian motions. We show where is an explicit, tractable, non‐negative function of . We use this formula to show that is bounded above by a ‐dependent constant, give a sharp estimate on the size of the set where as , and prove a large deviation principle for . We also give density estimates that take into account the relative positions of the Airy lines, and prove sharp two‐point tail bounds that are stronger than those for Brownian motion. These estimates are a key input in the classification of geodesic networks in the directed landscape. The paper is essentially self‐contained, requiring only tail bounds on the Airy point process and the Brownian Gibbs property as inputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.316

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it