MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402659296 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.08789

The Yaglom limit for branching Brownian motion with absorption and slightly subcritical drift

2024· preprint· en· W4402659296 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Julien Berestycki, Jiaqi Liu, Bastien Mallein, Jason Schweinsberg

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsBrownian motionBranching (polymer chemistry)Limit (mathematics)Absorption (acoustics)PhysicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsMathematical analysisMathematicsChemistryQuantum mechanicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider branching Brownian motion with absorption in which particles move independently as one-dimensional Brownian motions with drift $-ρ$, each particle splits into two particles at rate one, and particles are killed when they reach the origin. Kesten (1978) showed that this process dies out with probability one if and only if $ρ\geq \sqrt{2}$. We show that in the subcritical case when $ρ> \sqrt{2}$, the law of the process conditioned on survival until time $t$ converges as $t \rightarrow \infty$ to a quasi-stationary distribution, which we call the Yaglom limit. We give a construction of this quasi-stationary distribution. We also study the asymptotic behavior as $ρ\downarrow \sqrt{2}$ of this quasi-stationary distribution. We show that the logarithm of the number of particles and the location of the highest particle are of order $ε^{-1/3}$, and we obtain a limit result for the empirical distribution of the particle locations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207