The Yaglom limit for branching Brownian motion with absorption and slightly subcritical drift
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider branching Brownian motion with absorption in which particles move independently as one-dimensional Brownian motions with drift $-ρ$, each particle splits into two particles at rate one, and particles are killed when they reach the origin. Kesten (1978) showed that this process dies out with probability one if and only if $ρ\geq \sqrt{2}$. We show that in the subcritical case when $ρ> \sqrt{2}$, the law of the process conditioned on survival until time $t$ converges as $t \rightarrow \infty$ to a quasi-stationary distribution, which we call the Yaglom limit. We give a construction of this quasi-stationary distribution. We also study the asymptotic behavior as $ρ\downarrow \sqrt{2}$ of this quasi-stationary distribution. We show that the logarithm of the number of particles and the location of the highest particle are of order $ε^{-1/3}$, and we obtain a limit result for the empirical distribution of the particle locations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".