Quantum mechanics predicts Bicoid interpretation time of less than a second
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The establishment and interpretation of the concentration gradient of the morphogen Bicoid ( Bcd ) is crucial for the successful embryonic development of fruit flies. However, the biophysical mechanisms behind the timely formation and subsequent interpretation of this prototypical morphogen gradient by its target genes are not yet completely understood. Recently a discrete time, one-dimensional quantum walk model of Bcd gradient formation has been successfully used to explain the observed multiple dynamic modes of the system. However, the question of its precise interpretation by its primary target gene hunchback ( hb ) remains still unanswered. In this paper it will be shown that the interpretation of the Bcd gradient by its primary target gene hb , with the observed precision of ∼ 10%, takes a time period of less than a second, as expected on the basis of recent experimental observations. Furthermore, the quantum walk model is also used to explain certain key observations of recent optogenetic experiments concerning the time windows for Bcd interpretation. Finally, it is concluded that the incorporation of quantum effects into the treatment of Bcd gradient represents a viable step in exploring its dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".