MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402660540 · doi:10.14740/jocmr5245

Potential Use of MicroRNA Technology in Thalassemia Therapy

2024· review· en· W4402660540 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lantip Rujito, Tirta Wardana, Wahyu Siswandari, Ita Margaretha Nainggolan, Teguh Haryo Sasongko

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Medicine Research · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan TeknologiJenderal Soedirman University
KeywordsMedicineThalassemiamicroRNACancer researchInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thalassemia encompasses a group of inherited hemoglobin disorders characterized by reduced or absent production of the α- or β-globin chains, leading to anemia and other complications. Current management relies on lifelong blood transfusions and iron chelation, which is burdensome for patients. This review summarizes the emerging therapeutic potential of modulating microRNAs (miRNAs) to treat thalassemia. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression through sequence-specific binding to messenger RNAs (mRNAs). While they commonly repress gene expression by binding to the 3' untranslated regions (UTRs) of target mRNAs, miRNAs can also interact with 5'UTRs and gene promoters to activate gene expression. Many miRNAs are now recognized as critical regulators of erythropoiesis and are abnormally expressed in β-thalassemia. Therapeutically restoring levels of deficient miRNAs or inhibiting overexpression through miRNA mimics or inhibitors (antagomir), respectively, has shown preclinical efficacy in ameliorating thalassemic phenotypes. The miR-144/451 cluster is especially compelling for targeted upregulation to reactivate fetal hemoglobin synthesis. Advances in delivery systems are addressing previous challenges in stability and targeting of miRNA-based drugs. While still early, gene therapy studies suggest combinatorial approaches with miRNA modulation may provide synergistic benefits. Several key considerations remain including enhancing delivery, minimizing off-target effects, and demonstrating long-term safety and efficacy. While no miRNA therapies have yet progressed to clinical testing for thalassemia specifically, important lessons are being learned through clinical trials for other diseases and conditions, such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and viral. If limitations can be overcome through multi-disciplinary collaboration, miRNAs hold great promise to expand and transform treatment options for thalassemia in the future by precisely targeting pathogenic molecular networks. Ongoing innovations, such as advancements in miRNA delivery systems, improved targeting mechanisms, and enhanced understanding of miRNA biology, continue to drive progress in this emerging field towards realizing the clinical potential of miRNA-based medicines for thalassemia patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.282
GPT teacher head0.568
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Medicine ResearchSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207