Prediction of preterm birth in multiparous women using logistic regression and machine learning approaches
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To predict preterm birth (PTB) in multiparous women, comparing machine learning approaches with traditional logistic regression. A population-based cohort study was conducted using data from the Ontario Better Outcomes Registry and Network (BORN). The cohort included all multiparous women who delivered a singleton birth at 20-42 weeks' gestation in an Ontario hospital between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2014. The primary outcome was PTB < 37 weeks, with spontaneous PTB analyzed as a secondary outcome. Stepwise logistic regression and the Boruta machine learning were used to select the important variables during the first and second trimester. For building prediction models, the whole data set were divided for the two independent parts: two-third for training the classifiers (Logistic regression, random forests, decision trees, and artificial neural networks) and one-third for model validation. Then, the training data set were balanced by random over sampling technique. The best hyper parameters were obtained by the tenfold cross validation. The performance of all models was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC). The cohort included 145,846 births, of which 8125 (5.57%) were preterm. In first-trimester models, the strongest predictors of PTB were previous PTB, preexisting diabetes, and abnormal pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. In the testing data set, the highest predictive ability was seen for artificial neural networks, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 68.8% (95% CI 67.6-70.1%). In second-trimester models, addition of infant sex, attendance at first-trimester appointment, medication exposure, and abnormal alpha-fetoprotein concentrations increased the AUC to 72.1% (95% CI 71.1-73.1%) with logistic regression. With the inclusion of the variable complications during pregnancy, the AUC increased to 80.5% (95% CI 79.6-81.5%) using logistic regression. For both overall and spontaneous PTB, during both the first and second trimesters, models yielded negative predictive values of 97%. Overall, machine learning and logistic regression produced similar performance for prediction of PTB. For overall and spontaneous PTB, both first- and second-trimester models provided negative predictive values of ~ 97%, higher than that of fetal fibronectin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".