MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Heat Acclimation By Warm-water Immersion Enhances Whole-body Heat Loss In Older Adults

2024· article· en· W4402662219 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kristina‐Marie T. Janetos, Fergus K. O’Connor, Brodie J. Richards, Nicholas J. Koetje, James J. McCormic, Andreas D. Flouris, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmersion (mathematics)AcclimatizationHeat illnessEnvironmental scienceBiologyEcologyMeteorologyPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whole-body heat loss declines with increasing age (~3-4% per decade). Consequently, relative to their younger counterparts, older adults experience greater increases in core temperature and cardiovascular strain during heat stress. A recent report showed that heat acclimation induced by 90-min of continuous moderate-intensity exercise performed over 7-days in the heat increased whole-body heat loss in physically active older adults. However, such a protocol may not be tenable for many older adults who are sedentary or not engaged in regular physical activity. Heat acclimation via warm-water immersion has been shown to enhance heat loss and reduce core temperature in young adults during heat stress. Therefore, such an intervention may be an effective alternate approach to exercise to improve heat dissipation in older adults. PURPOSE: To determine if heat acclimation by warm-water immersion over 7-days would induce an increase in whole-body heat loss in older adults. METHODS: Twelve habitually active older males (mean (SD): 69 (6) years) completed 7-days of warm-water immersion (~40 °C) for 60-minutes at a fixed core temperature of 38.5 °C. Before (Day 0) and after (Day 8) the heat acclimation protocol, whole-body dry and evaporative heat loss was measured by direct calorimetry during three bouts of incremental exercise, consisting of 30-minutes of cycling at increasing fixed rates of metabolic heat production of 150, 200, and 250 W/m2, each separated by 15-minutes of recovery in the heat (40 °C, 15% relative humidity). Core (rectal) temperature and heart rate were measured continuously. Data in the last five minutes of the final exercise bout (250 W/m2) were analyzed via a paired t-test. RESULTS: Relative to Day 0, whole-body heat loss was elevated by 29 W/m2 [95% Confidence Interval: 19, 39] on Day 8 (P < 0.001). This was paralleled by a decrease in body heat storage (-82 [-116, -48] kJ) and rectal temperature (-0.3 [-0.5, -0.2] °C; both P < 0.01), as well as a reduction in cardiovascular strain evidenced by a decrease in heart rate (-12 [-7, -17] beats/min) on Day 8 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: We showed that a brief 7-day warm-water immersion heat acclimation protocol improved heat loss capacity in older males leading to a reduction in thermal and cardiovascular strain during exercise heat stress. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and Mitacs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207