MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Life Participation In Strength Training May Preserve Function And Reduce Pain Burden In Knee Osteoarthritis

2024· article· en· W4402662272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicProblem Solving Skills Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoarthritisPhysical medicine and rehabilitationTraining (meteorology)Physical therapyFunction (biology)Knee painMedicinePsychologyAlternative medicineGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Strength training (ST) can decrease knee osteoarthritis (OA) disability and pain. The purpose was to compare knee OA functional outcomes and pain in later life based on volume of ST participation over a lifetime. METHODS: Six-year data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were analyzed. Participants (N = 354; at risk for OA or symptomatic for OA) were grouped based on regular ST in lifetime epochs (years): 12-18, 19-34, 35-49, >50, where ST0 = no ST during any time, and ST4 = ST in all epochs. Outcomes were compared among groups over six-years: days with activity-limiting knee pain (last 30 days); Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function and pain scores; onset of mobility disability (walk speed <1 m/s); 5 repetition-chair rise time, 20-m walk speed; Physical Activity Score for the Elderly (PASE); OA onset at other joints; pain medication use. RESULTS: ST0 reported more pain-limited days than other groups at baseline (4.6 vs 2.6-3.5d; p = .002). WOMAC function and pain subscores in the left knee were 18-51% and 25-44% higher, respectively, in ST0 over time than other groups (p < .001). WOMAC function and pain subscores in the right knee were 19-42% (p < 0.001) and 23-30% (p = 0.002) in ST0 over time than other groups. Fewer participants in ST3 and ST4 developed mobility disability (0.4-0.6% vs 2.8-3.8%; p = <0.001). ST3 and ST4 demonstrated faster 5-repetition chair rise time and 20-m walk speed than ST1 and ST0 over six years (all p < .05). ST4 generated highest PASE scores and ST0 lowest PASE scores over time (p = .013). Six-year hand OA onset was lower in ST2 and ST3 than other groups (4.6-5.2% vs 7.0-9.2%; p = .007). Pain medication use was lowest in ST4 and highest in ST0 at baseline (6.0% vs 12.6%; p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: ST engagement during a lifetime may help preserve mobility, physical activity levels, and function while reducing the need for pain medication later in life for individuals who are at risk for OA or who have progressive OA. NATL INST OF HLTH NIAMS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it