MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Arterial Oxygen Saturation Variability Increases During Stepwise Steady State Inspired Hypoxia

2024· article· en· W4402662326 on OpenAlexaff
Monica K. Russell, Christian A. Clermont, John F. Horton, Jennifer M. Demarty, Leo Transfiguracion, Breann R. Worobets, M. Pineda, Pro Stergiou, Michael J. Asmussen, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsMount Royal UniversityUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Sport Centre Pacific
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)OxygenSaturation (graph theory)CardiologyInternal medicineChemistryMedicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR) elicited during exposure to hypoxia is highly variable between individuals. This may result in high variability in the pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) and O2 saturation (SaO2), particularly with more extreme hypoxia. The inter-individual variability in PaO2 and SaO2 during stepwise inspired hypoxia has not been well-characterized. PURPOSE: To assess the inter-individual variability in alveolar ventilation (V̇A), PaO2, and SaO2 during incremental stepwise steady-state inspired hypoxia at rest. METHODS: 28 healthy participants (10F, 18 M) were exposed to five stepwise plateaus of reduced inspired O2 with incremental reductions in the fraction of inspired O2 (FIO2) during supine rest, including 0.21 (ambient air), 0.18, 0.16, 0.14, and 0.12. Five serial blood samples were drawn through an indwelling radial arterial catheter over two minutes during each inspired O2 step, and V̇A (calculated from PaCO2), PaO2 and SaO2 values were averaged within each FIO2 stage for each participant. Levene’s tests were used to assess the differences in the variances across hypoxic stages (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Variances in V̇A and PaO2 were unchanged with hypoxia (p = 0.984 and p = 0.327, respectively), yet SaO2 variances were significantly different between FIO2 stages (F(4,135) = 11.91, p < 0.001), with increases in variance as FIO2 levels decreased from ambient air: 0.9, 2.7, 7.4, 19.1, and 37.1 SaO2% for FIO2 levels of 0.21, 0.18 (p = 0.148), 0.16 (p = 0.012), 0.14 (p = 0.01), and 0.12 (p = 0.009), respectively (Figure 1). CONCLUSIONS: The inter-individual variability in SaO2 responses increased with decreased levels of FIO2 at rest, despite unchanged variability in V̇A and PaO2. These data highlight the inherent inter-individual variability of integrated cardiorespiratory and blood gas responses during the physiological transport and uptake of O2 during exposure to acute stepwise hypoxia in healthy humans.NSERC Discovery Grant

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances→French-language works237,207→