MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The Metabolic Cost Of Breathing During Exercise: Effects Of Age And Sex

2024· article· en· W4402662471 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shalaya Kipp, Sierra R. Arn, Micheal G. Leahy, A. William Sheel

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolic costMedicineBreathingPhysical therapyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During exercise there is an increase in ventilation and a corresponding increase in the uptake of O2 by the respiratory muscles. Both sex-based structural differences in the respiratory system and age-associated declines in pulmonary function likely increase the O2 cost of breathing (VO2RM) during exercise. PURPOSE: We sought to assess the effects of age and sex on VORM during exercise in healthy younger and older, males and females. METHODS: Forty healthy participants (10 young males 23 ± 3 y; 10 young females 23 ± 3 y; 10 older males 63 ± 3 y, 10 older females 63 ± 6 y) mimicked their exercise breathing patterns (voluntary hyperpnea) in the absence of exercise. We had participants match the important mechanical components of exercise hyperpnea: minute ventilation, tidal volume, breathing frequency, duty cycle, operating lung volume and the work of breathing at 45, 60, 75 and 100% of maximal O2 uptake. To determine VO2RM, we calculated a net oxygen cost by subtracting whole-body resting VO2. RESULTS: Young females had a higher VO2RM for a given absolute ventilation compared to the young males at ventilations >75 L/min (P = 0.031). Similarly, older females had a higher VO2RM for a given absolute ventilation compared to the older males at ventilations >70 L/min (P = 0.023). At maximal exercise, VO2RM represented a greater fraction of whole-body VO2 in young females, 12.8 ± 3.9%, compared to young males, 10.7 ± 3.0% (P = 0.011), while VO2RM represented a similar fraction of whole-body VO2 in older females 13.5 ± 2.3% and 13.2 ± 3.3% in older males. Furthermore, both younger and older males had better respiratory muscle efficiency than their female counterparts at maximal exercise (Female: 5.6% ± 1.0% vs 4.8% ± 1.3%, P = 0.011; Males: 7.0% ± 1.8% vs 6.1% ± 2.5%, P = 0.015). Similarly, younger participants were more efficient than older participants (6.5% ± 1.5% vs. 5.5 ± 2.0%; P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The normal age-related changes in respiratory structure and function, in addition to sex-based differences in airway anatomy, have a significant effect on the efficiency and cost incurred to breathe during exercise. The greater cost in older individuals, especially older women, may indicate a greater fraction of cardiac output is directed to the respiratory muscles and may influence blood flow distribution during exercise. British Columbia Lung Association and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→