MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Impact Of Exercise Intensity On Acute Irisin Release And Insulin Sensitivity Across Obesity Status

2024· article· en· W4402662608 on OpenAlexaffabout
Brittany V. Rioux, Yadab Paudel, Amy M. Thomson, Logan E. Peskett, Martin Sénéchal

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin sensitivityIntensity (physics)Internal medicineObesitySensitivity (control systems)InsulinExercise intensityEndocrinologyMedicineInsulin resistancePhysicsHeart rateOpticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Irisin is an adipo-myokine that has been shown to increase during acute exercise. Irisin may play a key role in exercise-related health benefits in individuals living with obesity and/or diabetes. However, it is unclear whether exercise intensity impacts irisin release and if these changes are associated with insulin sensitivity in individuals of different obesity status. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of exercise intensity on the acute release of irisin in non-obese (NOB) and overweight-obese individuals (OB), and whether irisin release was associated with greater insulin sensitivity. METHODS: A randomized controlled crossover design study was conducted on 26 NOB (body mass index (BMI): < 25 kg/m2) and 26 OB (BMI: > 28 kg/m2) adults (19-50 years). Participants performed, in a random order, 35 mins of: 1) a resting condition, 2) a moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) session (50% of heart rate reserve (HRR)), and 3) a high-intensity interval training (HIIT) session (intervals increasing from 50% to 85-90% of HRR for 2 mins, every 5 mins). Blood samples were taken at 0, 14, 28, and 35 mins to quantify irisin via ELISA and western blotting. Each participant underwent a 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test from which insulin sensitivity (Si) was estimated using the Matsuda index. NOB and OB participants were categorized into low-Si (< 25 percentile Si) and high-Si (> 25 percentile Si). RESULTS: No significant differences in body composition, fitness, or metabolic profiles were observed between low- and high-Si groups in NOB nor OB individuals (p > .05). Insulin sensitivity was positively correlated with irisin release during MICT (all p < .05) and after 28 minutes of HIIT in NOB, but was not associated with irisin in neither MICT nor HIIT in OB. NOB individuals displayed significantly higher irisin release than OB in all conditions (p < .01). NOB individuals with low-Si had a 1.58-fold (p < .01) increase in irisin during HIIT exercise, while NOB with high-Si had a 3.17-fold (p < .05) increase. OB individuals with low-Si and high-Si had a 1.24 and 1.10-fold increase in irisin (all p < .05) during HIIT. CONCLUSION: Irisin may be released differently with varying intensities of exercise. The release of irisin may vary according to obesity status, with healthy individuals releasing more irisin compared to individuals with obesity. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, ResearchNB, Diabetes Action Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→