MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metabolite Accumulation And Power Output During And After Fatiguing Exercise In Young And Older Adults

2024· article· en· W4402662920 on OpenAlexaff
Nicolas Royer, Leah M. Kern, Robin Trama, Sandra K. Hunter, R. H. Fitts, Christopher W. Sundberg

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetabolitePower (physics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationGerontologyMedicinePsychologyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fatigability of limb muscles during high-intensity dynamic exercise is postulated to be determined by the accumulation of metabolites, namely hydrogen ions (H+) and inorganic phosphate (Pi). We previously showed that the increased fatigability of older adults during dynamic exercise was accompanied by a greater accumulation of metabolites compared with young adults. However, the time course of metabolite accumulation in relation to power output during and after dynamic fatiguing exercise is unknown. PURPOSE: Determine the time course of metabolite accumulation and changes in power during lower limb fatiguing exercise and recovery in young and older adults. METHODS: 9 young (20-36 yrs; 5 women) and 8 older adults (69-77 yrs; 4 women) performed a 4-min fatiguing knee extension exercise (1 maximal velocity contraction every 2 s) lifting a load equivalent to 20% of their maximal voluntary isometric contraction while prone in the bore of an MRI scanner. Recovery was measured with sets of 5 maximal dynamic contractions (1 every 2 s) at 30, 60, 150, 300, and 600 s after exercise. Intramuscular [Pi] and [H+] were measured with 31P-MRS, and statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the time course differences between the metabolite accumulation and power during exercise and recovery. RESULTS: Fatigability was ~1.6-fold greater in older than young adults (P < 0.001), which was accompanied by a greater decrease in pH (6.71 ± 0.07 vs. 6.62 ± 0.10, P = 0.043) and increase in Pi (24.7 ± 2.4 mM vs. 32.2 ± 5.6 mM, P = 0.002) by the end of exercise. Except for the first 32 s of exercise where pH increased while power decreased, the time course of H+ accumulation and power loss was similar. However, after exercise H+ continued to increase for 60s as power was recovering. In contrast, Pi accumulated more rapidly than the loss in power for the first 152 s of exercise, after which Pi no longer accumulated but power continued to decrease. After exercise, the recovery of power and Pi followed a similar time course. There were no age effects on the relationship between power output and metabolites at any time point during or after exercise. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that both H+ and Pi are essential metabolites disrupting power during and in recovery from fatiguing exercise and that the effects of these metabolites are similar in young and older adults. Supported by NIA R01 grant (AG048262) to Christopher Sundberg, Robert Fitts and Sandra Hunter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicExercise and Physiological ResponsesFrench-language works237,207