MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Neuromuscular Performance Among Covid-19 Survivors

2024· article· en· W4402663067 on OpenAlexaff
Stacey Woods, Oz Ben-Yoseph, Bareket Falk, Einat Kodesh

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsBrock UniversityUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)MedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationVirologyInternal medicineOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most individuals who contract SARS-CoV-2 recover. However, some report lingering fatigue and weakness, independent of the clinical symptoms during illness. PURPOSE: To examine differences in neuromuscular function between COVID-19 survivors and healthy young adults. METHODS: 12 healthy (24.4 ± 2.6 yrs) and 10 COVID-19 survivors (25.9 ± 1.7 yrs), 5.1 ± 3.8 months following contracting SARS-CoV-2. None of the survivors were hospitalized, but all reported various symptoms during and following illness. A subsample of 4 COVID-19 survivors reported systemic daily fatigue symptoms. Participants performed 5 s maximal isometric knee extensions (MVC), 10s submaximal contractions (25% and 70%MVC), and a fatiguing contraction (MVC to exhaustion). Volitional activation was determined during MVC, using the interpolated twitch technique. Bipolar electromyography (EMG) was used to characterize muscle activity. Muscle size was assessed using ultrasound. RESULTS: No differences were observed between healthy and COVID-19 groups in anthropometric measures, including quadriceps muscle depth (3.3 ± 0.8 and 3.4 ± 0.9 cm, respectively). There were no differences in muscle performance (peak torque: 2.3 ± 0.9 and 2.9 ± 1.0 Nm/kg, rate of torque development: 1211 ± 519 and 1249 ± 512 Nm/s, respectively), volitional activation (94.3 ± 4.8 and 95.6 ± 4.5%, respectively) and other neuromuscular measures (EMG amplitude, coactivation), between groups during MVC or submaximal contractions. During fatiguing contraction, the rate of perceived exertion and rate of torque reduction were not different between groups. However, among the subsample of survivors experiencing daily fatigue, the rate of torque reduction was significantly greater than healthy (0.84 ± 0.26 vs. 0.39 ± 0.10 %MVC/%time, respectively, p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Past COVID-19 infection does not affect brief maximal and submaximal neuromuscular performance. However, prolonged contractions may be compromised among survivors who experience fatigue during daily life. Sandwich Scholarship, Haifa University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→