MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

What Are The Qualifications For An Exercise Professional? A Content-Analysis Of Canadian Job Advertisements

2024· article· en· W4402663088 on OpenAlexaffabout
Madeline E. Shivgulam, Jocelyn Waghorn, Molly K. Courish, Jonathon R. Fowles, Taniya S. Nagpal, Myles W. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Pedagogy
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaAcadia UniversityDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdvertisingContent analysisContent (measure theory)Job analysisBusinessPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceSociologyJob satisfactionSocial psychologyMathematicsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Numerous education and certification programs exist for individuals to become an exercise professional. Despite the general population seeking out exercise professionals and the strong interest of other healthcare providers in referring patients to exercise professionals, what characterizes an ‘exercise professional’ is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To summarize the required qualifications and certifications described in job advertisements hiring an ‘Exercise Professional’ in Canada. METHODS: A common career finding website (Indeed) and organizations that promote exercise professional career opportunities were searched for job advertisements in October 2023. The specific search terms were: “Kinesiology”, “Kinesiologist”, “Exercise Professional”, and “Exercise Physiologist”. Job advertisements that were hiring an exercise professional and described some exercise related duties were included. Content analysis was performed to summarize and quantify exercise professional job advertisement characteristics. RESULTS: Across searches, 177/1364 unique job advertisements met inclusion criteria. Job titles were grouped into six categories: Kinesiologist (n = 88/177), Personal Trainer (n = 49/177), Fitness Coach/Instructor (n = 38/177), Strength & Conditioning Specialist (n = 5/177), Exercise Physiologist (n = 4/177), and other (n = 31/177). Most positions required (n = 101) or preferred (n = 36) a Kinesiology degree. In addition, n = 48/92 (88 Kinesiology and 4 Exercise Physiologist positions) indicated a need or interest in applicants having a membership with a provincial Kinesiology affiliation, n = 8/92 a Clinical Exercise Physiologist certification, and n = 6/92 a general ‘kinesiology certification”. For personal trainer positions, most listed a ‘certified personal trainer’ (n = 36/49), with fewer providing specific certifications (n = 9/49; e.g., YMCA, Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology, American College of Sports Medicine, etc.). CONCLUSIONS: Job advertisements for exercise professionals vary in their title, whether certifications are required, and specific certifications. There is a need to determine the unique requirements of exercise professional positions and guidelines for the (di)similar scope of practice across exercise professional training.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0130.018
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.186
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicPhysical Education and PedagogyFrench-language works237,207