MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Social Cohesion And Strong Social Bonds In Communities: The Missing Link In Promoting An Active-lifestyle

2024· article· en· W4402663316 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew M. Rosenblatt, Timothy Lau, Sivan Klil‐Drori

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLink (geometry)Cohesion (chemistry)SociologySocial psychologyPsychologyComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Physical inactivity is a significant and modifiable risk factor for multiple chronic conditions including reduced brain health and cognitive decline. Yet nearly 85% of the world’s population is sedentary. More effective strategies to promote physical activity (PA) are urgently needed. Programs aimed at behavioral change show effectiveness mostly in the short-term and do not sustain active lifestyles. However, recent studies show that communities with strong social bonds are likely to provide safe and accessible spaces for recreational PA. Therefore, promoting PA together with strengthening community social cohesion may significantly improve PA participation. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of publications on brain-health benefits of PA, community cohesion and health promotion. The authors searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, and EBSCO. Studies exploring the impact of PA on the brain were evaluated. Additionally, publications on interventions for promotion of PA, public health, and public policies were explored. RESULTS: Studies demonstrated that moderate intensity PA increases cerebral flow, oxygen extraction, and neural metabolism. These processes initiate additional events which promote neuronal health, involving enhancement of neurotrophic factors and balanced release of neurotransmitters necessary for brain health and function. Moreover, social networks and social cohesion serve as influential mediums for disseminating information, shaping attitudes, and fostering collective engagement in PA. Thus, communities with strong social bonds are more likely to provide safe and accessible space for recreational activities. Public policy can ensure such environments are created and sustained. CONCLUSIONS: PA advances brain function by multiple pathways. Additionally, communities with high social cohesion promote PA participation. Well-designed policies can facilitate the development of infrastructure, such as parks and recreational facilities; incentivize community programs encouraging physical activity; and promote health-management behaviors. By recognizing the interplay between social networks, social cohesion, and public policy, we can create environments that empower individuals to embrace and maintain physically active lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction→French-language works237,207→