MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Gross Motor Skills Profile And Assessment Of An Intervention Program For Morocco Children With ASD

2024· article· en· W4402663432 on OpenAlexaff
Rachid Touali, Jamal Zerouaoui, El Mahjoub Chakir, Hung Tien Bui, Mario Leone, Maxime Allisse

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGross motor skillIntervention (counseling)PsychologyMotor skillDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a cluster of developmental disabilities encompassing motor impairments. Due to potential regional variations, certain countries, like Morocco, lack precise information regarding the profiles of children with ASD in their population. The first objective of this study is to provide a preliminary overview of the gross motor skill profile of Moroccan ASD children. The secondary aim is to assess the impact of an intervention program expressly designed for the unique needs of children with ASD. METHODS: The total sample size (N = 32) consisted of 14 children diagnosed with ASD and 18 children with typical motor development. The ASD cohort was stratified into two distinct groups: the experimental group (N = 7) underwent a 15-week training program specifically targeting gross motor skill development, while the ASD control group (N = 7) experienced a 15-week conventional physical education (PE) program. Both groups were assessed using the UQAC-UQAM test battery, comprising 10 items targeting five gross motor skill factors (segmental speed, agility, reaction time, balance, and coordination). RESULTS: Each motor skill item value was standardized through Z score transformation. A composite score was generated by summing the Z scores of the 10 motor skill items. Although no significant difference was observed at baseline (T1; p = 0.168) between the experimental ASD group (Z score = -0.87 ± 0.14) and the ASD control group (Z score = -1.04 ± 0.28), the composite score after 15 weeks of specific motor skills training (T4) showed a significant improvement (P ≤ 0.001; effect size = 2.88), with a Z score of -0.306 ± 0.192 versus -1.346 ± 0.361 in favor of the experimental group. Thus, the experimental group progressed from the 19th percentile to the 39th percentile, while the ASD control group regressed from the 15th percentile to the 9th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an initial overview of the motor skills development profile of Moroccan children with ASD. Our results highlight the importance of adapting PE programs according to the specific needs of ASD children. The application of conventional PE programs with ASD children appears to yield poor results. This study, however, demonstrates the possibility of a notable improvement in ASD children in the Moroccan cultural context. we have not received any subsidies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→French-language works237,207→