MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

FUNCTIONAL AND MORHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES OF MUSCLE MITOCHONDRIA IN CFS AND POST-COVID SYNDROME

2024· article· en· W4402663530 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jürgen M. Steinacker, Birgit Ohmayer, Jasmine Leonike Buhl, Marion Schneider, Paul Walther, Enrico Calcia, Achim Jerg, Lynn Matits, Daniel Alexander Bizjak

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MitochondrionSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakMedicineBetacoronavirusVirologyNeuroscienceBiologyInternal medicineOutbreakGeneticsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Patients suffering from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) or Post-COVID (PCS) exhibit a reduced physiological performance capability with detrimental effects on quality of life and exercise capacity. Impaired mitochondrial function and morphology may play a pivotal role. Muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) capacity and mitochondrial morphology was assesed in 15 CFS and 15 PCS patients and 11 healthy controls (HC). METHODS: After muscle biopsy, mitochondrial OXPHOS capacity was measured in permeabilized muscle fibers of the m. quadriceps femoris by high-resolution respirometry. Mitochondrial morphology (subsarcolemmal/intermyofibrillar mitochondrial form/cristae/diameter/circumference/area) and content (number and proportion/cell) was assessed by electron microscopy and analyzed by ImageJ. The Canadian Consensus Criteria for determining CFS were used to include CFS (10f/5 m; age 36.1 ± 11.6 years; BMI 25.0 ± 3.6 kg/m2) and PCS (13f/2 m; age 40.5 ± 13.2 years; BMI 21.9 ± 3.9 kg/m2). Robust one-way ANOVAs for OXPHOS, post-hoc tests and correlation analysis for morphology/content. RESULTS: Normal OXPHOS capacity of complex I was reduced in PCS compared to HC (P = 0.031), and PCS showed lower values for all other OXPHOS assessments compared to CFS and HC (ns). While the subsarcolemmal area, volume/cell, diameter and perimeter was higher in PCS vs. CFS, no difference was observed for these respective variables regarding intermyofibrillar mitochondria. Both the intermyofibrillar and subsarcolemmal cristae score was higher in PCS compared to CFS (P < 0.001), indicating a decreased morphological stability and impaired mitochondrial structure in CFS and a positive association between cristae score and cristae form. CONCLUSIONS: Although CFS and PCS exhibit increased fatigue and mitochondrial capacity is impaired in both populations, the progressed pathological morphological changes in CFS suggests structural changes due to prolonged inactivity or unknown molecular causes compared to a probably direct virus-induced immunology alterations and damage in PCS. The decreased OXPHOS capacity in PCS may due to physical inactivity, the lower complex I activity suggests a target to its first role in the electron gradient machinery and importance in energy production. Grant of the ministry of science Baden-Wuertemberg

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→