Excess health care use is significantly and persistently reduced following diagnosis of late‐onset epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of late-onset epilepsy (LOE) is rising, and these patients may use an excess of health care resources. This study aimed to measure pre-/post-diagnostic health care use (HCU) for patients with LOE compared to controls. METHODS: This was an observational open cohort study covering years 1998-2019 using UK population-based linked primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink [CPRD]) and hospital (HES) electronic health records. The participants included patients with incident LOE enrolled in CPRD and 1:10 age-, sex-, and general practice-matched controls. The exposure was incident LOE (diagnosed at age ≥65) using a 5-year washout. The main outcome was all HCU (primary care [PC], accident and emergency [A&E], admitted patient and outpatient care) using inverse proportional weighting to PC use and HCU by setting. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to examine pre-/post-diagnostic HCU between patients with LOE and controls over 4 years either side of diagnosis/matching date. An adjusted mixed-effects negative binomial regression was used for post-diagnosis HCU interactions. RESULTS: Of 2 569 874 people ≥65 years of age, 1048 (4%) developed incident LOE. Mean weighted total HCU increased by 32 visits per patient-year (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 13-50, p = .003) until LOE diagnosis, and then dropped by a mean of 60 visits per patient-year (95% CI: -81 to -40). There was an acute rise and fall over the 1-2 years immediately pre-/post-diagnosis. Incident HCU remained higher for LOE compared to controls post-diagnosis (adjusted incidence rate ratio: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.65-1.70; p < .001), including A&E, outpatient, and admitted care. SIGNIFICANCE: Health care use demonstrates an acute on chronic rise over the 4 years before diagnosis of LOE. To what extent the partial reversal of the acute pre-diagnosis rise, and the mediators of the accelerated increase compared to controls are attributed to epilepsy, comorbid and bidirectional disease states, or a combination of both warrants further exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".