MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402667727 · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad7dcb

A hybrid PCA acceleration method for rapid real-time 2D MRI

2024· article· en· W4402667727 on OpenAlexaff
Mark H. Wright, Gawon Han, Jihyun Yun, Eugene Yip, Zsolt Gabos, Nawaid Usmani, B. G. Fallone, Keith Wachowicz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics in Medicine and Biology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContouringAccelerationPrincipal component analysisFrame (networking)Computer scienceImage qualityFrame rateArtificial intelligenceSampling (signal processing)Computer visionAlgorithmImage (mathematics)MathematicsPhysicsComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objective. To develop a 2D MR acceleration method utilizing principal component analysis (PCA) in a hybrid fashion for rapid real-time applications. Approach. Retrospective testing was performed on 10 lung, 10 liver and 10 prostate 3T MRI data sets for image quality and target contourability. Sampling of k-space is performed by acquiring central (low-frequency) data in every frame while the high-frequency data is incoherently undersampled such that all of k-space is acquired in a pre-determined number of frames. Firstly, principal components (PCs) representative of intra-frame correlations between central and outer k-space data are used to estimate unsampled data in the frame of interest. Then to add further stability, PCs representative of time-domain fluctuations within a reconstruction window of the most recent frames are fit to outer k-space data (including above estimations) to obtain final estimates in the frame of interest. Accelerated reconstructions between 3x and 8x were tested for image quality and contourability along with the optimal number of PCs for fitting. Main results. It was found that at higher acceleration rates, image quality did not deteriorate significantly. Similarly, it was found that the images were of sufficient quality to contour a target using auto-contouring software at all tested acceleration rates and sites. SSIM values were found to be ⩾0.91 at all accelerations tested. Similarly dice coefficients at the different sites were found to be ⩾0.89 even at 8x accelerations which is on par with or better than intra-observer variation. Significance. This method appears to produce improved image quality and contourability compared to previous PCA methods while also allowing a greater number of PCs to be used in reconstruction. The method can be run using a simple single-channel coil and does not require significant computing power to meet real-time interventional standards (reconstruction times ∼60 ms/frame on Intel i5 CPU).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.485
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics in Medicine and Biology→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→