MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402668243 · doi:10.2118/220790-ms

Graph-Level Feature Embedding with Spatial– Temporal GCN Method for Interconnected Well Production Forecasting

2024· article· en· W4402668243 on OpenAlexaff
Ziming Xu, Juliana Y. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEmbeddingFeature (linguistics)GraphProduction (economics)Artificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Data miningTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Deep-learning models have been employed for production forecasting in oil and gas reservoirs, but they often assume that each well operates independently, neglecting the connectivity and dynamic interactions between wells. This simplification can significantly compromise prediction accuracy. Therefore, graph convolutional networks (GCNs) have been applied to incorporate data from neighbouring wells. However, existing spatial-temporal GCN (ST-GCN) methods are mainly used for autoregressive tasks and face limitations in predicting newly developed wells and fully utilizing temporal neighbour interactions. This study introduces an ST-graph- level feature embedding (ST-GFE) method that provides accurate production forecasting for newly developed wells. It enhances forecasting by aggregating the historical data from neighbouring wells into a single feature vector. This aggregated vector, merging local and contextual information, contains richer information about the studied region. We evaluate ST-GFE using a dataset of 6,605 Montney shale gas wells, incorporating formation properties, fracture parameters, and production history. The ST-GFE is integrated with a non-autoregressive encoder-decoder structure to do production forecasting. The findings demonstrate that ST-GFE significantly improves prediction accuracy for newly developed wells compared to the purely temporal models, such as recurrent neural network (RNN)-based and Transformer models. ST-GFE adapts to production changes in adjacent wells, providing accurate predictions across various application scenarios, including shut-in and in-fill drilling activities. Additionally, while traditional GCNs require a full-batch training approach that leads to scalability issues, the ST-GFE model treats each well and its surrounding wells as a graph, enabling batch training and significantly reducing memory usage. Furthermore, the model dynamically updates its forecasts with real-time production data, enhancing precision and relevance. Experimental results confirm that ST-GFE effectively leverages spatio-temporal dynamics and interactions between adjacent wells, further improving production forecasting accuracy. This method enhances predictions and generalization capabilities for new developing locations, broadening its applicability to various drilling and production scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207