MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402672689 · doi:10.32645/26028131.1248

Valoración económica del agua de acuerdo con el uso

2023· article· en· W4402672689 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTierra Infinita · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resource Management and Quality
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper reviews several scientific studies on the economic valuation of water and its importance in different contexts. Different methods used to measure the value of water are suggested, such as integrative valuation of ecosystem services, contingent valuation, revealed valuation, and assessment of willingness to pay for improvements in water quality. Being a review article a metadata analysis was performed in the Scopus platform where the words valuation, economic, water were used, restrictions were applied in relation to: periodicity from 2010 to the present, limited to environmental sciences, economics, econometrics and finance, biological sciences and agriculture; in the titles sciences of the whole environment, environmental management and ecological economics; the filtered language is English in which the scientific articles were written, the main objective is to systematize each of the 100 researches, a base document of consultation for future studies in economic valuation of water is structured. Descriptive analysis was applied using the "R" program, including bibliometrix and biblioshiny. The importance of considering water quality in the estimation of benefits is highlighted, since households are willing to pay more for better quality drinking water. It is mentioned that water quality varies according to perceptions and factors such as age, trust in the authorities, health problems and education. The amount of income in a family is not a determining factor in the willingness to pay for water-related ecosystem services; respondents with higher levels of education and higher incomes are willing to pay more. Studies on the economic valuation of water in different countries, such as China, the United States, the United Kingdom, Kenya and Canada, are reported; these studies use different methods to obtain data on the preferences and willingness to pay of local residents, and the results are used to inform water policy and management decisions. The main conclusion is that water valuations, whether for public, private or intermediate production use, will not have objective significance unless they are accompanied by policies and decision-making by local, sectional, provincial, national authorities and governments of the day that allow for equitable conservation and commercialization for both conservers and users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it